Mukta Akter's Profile Page

SEO for beginners means learning four things in order: how search engines find and understand pages, how to figure out what your audience actually searches for, how to structure a page so both people and search engines can use it, and how to build enough authority that search engines trust you over the competition. Most beginners try to learn all four at once, from a dozen different sources, and end up with a pile of disconnected tips instead of a working process. I've spent the last 7+ years doing SEO for a living, mostly as a Top Rated Plus freelancer on Upwork with a 98% Job Success Score across 3,500+ completed projects. I've also taught SEO to more than 50,000 people through YouTube and courses. This guide is the version of "getting started with SEO" I wish someone had handed me when I started, instead of the scattered checklist version most people learn from. This is the foundation page for my SEO Masterclass. If you want the hands-on, structured version of everything below, with exercises and feedback, that's where it lives. If you just want to understand SEO properly first, keep reading. What is SEO? SEO, or search engine optimization, is the practice of improving a website so that search engines can find, understand and rank its pages for relevant searches, and so that people who click through find what they were looking for. That last part matters more than most beginner guides admit. Search engines optimize their results for user satisfaction, not for how well you followed a checklist, so SEO that ignores the actual person searching tends to stop working, no matter how many boxes it ticks technically. SEO sits inside a bigger category called organic search, which just means traffic you don't pay for directly, as opposed to paid ads. When people say "we need to do SEO," they usually mean some combination of technical fixes, content creation and link building, aimed at showing up higher in Google for searches that matter to their business. How search engines actually work, in plain terms Before any tactic makes sense, you need a rough model of what a search engine is doing behind the scenes. It comes down to three steps. Crawling. Search engines use automated programs, usually called bots or crawlers (Google's is called Googlebot), that follow links from page to page across the web, downloading what they find. If a page has no links pointing to it and isn't submitted anywhere, a crawler may never find it. Indexing. Once a page is crawled, the search engine decides whether to store it in its index, which is essentially a massive database of pages it considers worth showing in results. A page can be crawled but not indexed, usually because it's low quality, duplicate, or blocked by a technical setting. Ranking. When someone searches, the engine pulls candidate pages from its index and ranks them using hundreds of signals: relevance to the query, content quality, site authority, page experience, and more. Nobody outside Google has the full list, and Google changes it constantly, sometimes several times a day in small ways, and periodically in larger, named updates. What's stable is the underlying goal: rank the pages most likely to satisfy the person searching, and that stability is what makes the fundamentals in this guide worth learning instead of chasing whatever tactic worked last month. If you remember nothing else from this section, remember this: a page has to be crawlable, then indexable, before ranking is even possible. Beginners often jump straight to "how do I rank higher" while their page has a crawling or indexing problem that makes ranking irrelevant. Here's what that looks like in practice. I once audited a site where a new "Services" section had been added six months earlier, with genuinely good content, and it had never appeared in a single search result. The pages weren't linked from anywhere else on the site, and the sitemap hadn't been updated to include them. Googlebot had simply never found them. No amount of keyword optimization would have fixed that, because the problem was one step earlier in the process, at crawling, not at ranking. SEO tools for beginners: what's actually worth paying for You don't need a paid tool subscription to start learning SEO, but a few tools make the process considerably faster once you're past the absolute basics. Free and essential: Google Search Console and Google Analytics. Both are free, both are made by Google, and both give you direct data about how your site is actually performing, not an estimate from a third party. If you only ever use two tools, use these. Worth paying for once you're serious: Ahrefs, Semrush and Moz all offer keyword research, backlink analysis and rank tracking in one place. They overlap heavily in what they do; the differences are mostly in interface and specific data sources. I don't recommend beginners subscribe to one of these in their first month. Learn the concepts using free tools and Search Console data first, then add a paid tool once you understand what question you're actually trying to answer with it. Useful and free or cheap: Google PageSpeed Insights for speed and Core Web Vitals, Google's Rich Results Test for checking structured data, and Screaming Frog's free tier for crawling your own site up to 500 URLs, which is more than enough for most beginners' first technical audit. A tool doesn't do SEO for you. It gives you data faster than checking manually. The judgment about what that data means still has to come from understanding the fundamentals above. My approach to teaching SEO to beginners I don't start beginners with keyword research, even though most guides do. I start with search intent, because everything else depends on getting that right first. Search intent is the reason behind a search. Someone typing "best running shoes" wants to compare options before buying. Someone typing "running shoes size 10 blue" already knows what they want and is close to purchasing. Someone typing "how to choose running shoes" wants to learn, not buy yet. Three searches, three completely different pages needed to satisfy them. The single biggest mistake I see in beginner SEO work, across thousands of projects, is a page that's technically well optimized but built for the wrong intent. A blog post trying to rank for a search where Google consistently shows product pages will struggle no matter how good the writing is, because Google has already learned what searchers want for that query. Before you write a word of content or pick a keyword, look at what's currently ranking for it. That tells you what Google believes the intent is, and arguing with that is rarely worth it. A simple framework to hold all of this together I use a version of what I call the Search Visibility Framework with clients, and a simplified version of it works just as well for beginners trying to keep the pieces in order: Technical Foundation, then Search Intent, then Content Quality, then Topical Authority, then Entity Authority, then External Validation, then measurement. The order matters more than any individual step. Technical foundation comes first because nothing else works if a page can't be crawled and indexed. Search intent comes second because it determines what "good content" even means for a given page. Content quality and topical authority build on each other, one strong page becoming several strong, connected pages. Entity authority and external validation, meaning how clearly search engines understand who you are and how much the wider web trusts you, compound slowly over the pages and links that came before. Measurement closes the loop and tells you where to focus next. Most beginner frustration I see traces back to working out of order: writing content before fixing a technical crawling issue, or chasing backlinks before there's anything worth linking to. Keep the sequence roughly intact, and most of the individual tactics in this guide slot into place naturally. Step 1: Keyword research for beginners Keyword research is the process of finding the actual words and phrases people type into search engines related to your business, then deciding which ones are worth targeting. Start with what you already know Before opening any tool, write down the questions your customers actually ask you, in their own words, not your industry's internal terms. A dentist's customers search "tooth pain won't go away," not "endodontic symptomatology." This list, built from real conversations, is often more useful than anything a keyword tool produces on its own, because it starts from real intent instead of search volume. Use a tool to expand and validate Once you have a starting list, tools such as Google Keyword Planner, Ahrefs, Semrush or Ubersuggest can show you search volume (roughly how often a term is searched) and related terms you hadn't thought of. Volume numbers from different tools rarely match exactly. Treat them as directional, not precise. Weigh volume against difficulty and intent A keyword with high volume and high competition can take months or years to rank for as a new site. A lower-volume keyword that matches your exact service, with less competition, often brings in fewer visitors but far more of them convert. For beginners, I generally recommend starting with specific, lower-competition terms and building up, rather than chasing the biggest volume keyword in your niche on day one. Group keywords by topic, not by exact phrase Modern SEO doesn't require a separate page for every keyword variation. "Running shoes for beginners" and "best running shoes for new runners" are close enough in intent that one well-built page can rank for both, and several related terms besides. Group your list into topics, and build one strong page per topic instead of many thin pages competing with each other. Read the modifiers, not just the head term Small words attached to a keyword change the intent more than beginners expect. "Running shoes" alone is broad and probably too competitive to target directly as a new site. "Best running shoes for flat feet," "running shoes near me" and "cheap running shoes under $50" are three completely different searchers: one is researching, one wants a local store, one has a budget ceiling and is close to buying. Look for these modifiers, buy, best, near me, for [specific situation], vs, how to, review, because they tell you far more about intent than the head term does on its own. Don't ignore long-tail keywords Long-tail keywords are longer, more specific phrases with lower individual search volume. Individually they don't look impressive in a keyword tool. Collectively, on most established sites, they bring in more traffic than the small number of high-volume head terms, and they convert better because the searcher's intent is more specific. As a beginner with a new site, long-tail keywords are usually where you can realistically compete first, while the high-volume terms remain aspirational for later. Map keywords to pages before you start writing Once you've grouped your keyword list into topics, assign each group to either an existing page or a page you plan to create, and write that mapping down somewhere you'll actually refer back to. Without this step, it's easy to end up with two different pages unintentionally competing for the same keyword, a problem called keyword cannibalization, which can actually suppress both pages' rankings rather than helping either one. Step 2: On-page SEO basics On-page SEO covers everything you control directly on a given page to help it rank and to help visitors understand it. This is where most beginners spend their first few months, and it's a reasonable place to focus early because the fixes are usually within your control. Title tags The title tag is the clickable headline shown in search results. It should include your primary keyword naturally, describe what the page actually delivers, and stay under roughly 60 characters so it doesn't get cut off. A title tag that's just a keyword repeated ("Running Shoes, Buy Running Shoes, Running Shoes Sale") reads as spam to both users and search engines. Meta descriptions The meta description is the short summary under the title in search results. It doesn't directly affect rankings, but a well-written one affects whether people click. Write it as a genuine, specific pitch for the page's content, not a stuffed list of keywords. Headings and structure Use one H1 per page, matching the main topic, then H2s and H3s to break the content into a logical hierarchy. This helps readers scan the page and helps search engines understand which sections cover which subtopics. Skipping heading levels, or using headings purely for visual styling instead of structure, makes pages harder for both audiences to parse. Content that actually answers the query This is where I disagree with a lot of generic SEO advice. Word count targets, keyword density percentages and "add this many related terms" formulas are backwards. Write the content that actually and completely answers what the searcher needs, in language they'd use, and the length takes care of itself. Some queries deserve 300 words. Others deserve 3,000. Forcing a page to hit an arbitrary word count usually makes it worse, not better. Internal linking Link from relevant pages on your site to the page you want to rank, using descriptive anchor text rather than "click here." Internal links help search engines find and understand the relationship between your pages, and they help visitors find related content instead of leaving after one page. Image optimization Compress images so they don't slow down the page, use descriptive file names instead of "IMG_4821.jpg," and write alt text that actually describes the image for accessibility and for image search, rather than stuffing it with keywords. URL structure Keep URLs short, readable and descriptive: /running-shoes-for-beginners/ tells both a person and a search engine more than /category/4471/product-id-88213/. Where possible, include the primary keyword, avoid unnecessary parameters and dates that will make the URL look stale later, and keep the structure consistent across similar page types so your site's architecture stays logical as it grows. Structured data and schema markup Structured data is a standardized code format, usually JSON-LD, added to a page to explicitly tell search engines what type of content it is, a recipe, a product, an FAQ, a local business, an article. It doesn't guarantee better rankings, but it can unlock rich results in search, star ratings on a product listing, an expandable FAQ dropdown, which improve click-through rate even at the same ranking position. For beginners, I'd start with Article schema on blog content and FAQ schema on any page with genuine question-and-answer content, since both are straightforward to implement and directly relevant to most beginner sites. Google's Rich Results Test will tell you whether your markup is valid before you rely on it. Step 3: Technical SEO basics for beginners Technical SEO covers the infrastructure that lets search engines crawl, index and understand your site properly. Beginners often skip this because it feels less approachable than writing content, but a page that can't be crawled or indexed properly will never rank, regardless of how good the content is. Site speed and Core Web Vitals Google measures page experience partly through Core Web Vitals, a set of metrics covering loading speed, interactivity and visual stability. You don't need to memorize the exact thresholds as a beginner. You do need to know that a slow, janky page loses both rankings and visitors, and tools like Google PageSpeed Insights will show you exactly what's slowing a specific page down. Mobile-friendliness Google primarily uses the mobile version of your site for indexing and ranking, a practice called mobile-first indexing. If your site is hard to use on a phone, that's not a secondary concern anymore. It's the version Google is actually evaluating. XML sitemaps An XML sitemap is a file listing the pages on your site you want search engines to crawl and index. Submitting one through Google Search Console helps search engines discover your pages faster, particularly on larger or newer sites. Robots.txt This is a small text file that tells crawlers which parts of your site they're allowed to access. It's easy to misconfigure, and I've seen more than one beginner accidentally block their entire site from being crawled with a single wrong line in this file. Check it early, and check it again after any major site change. Canonical tags When the same or very similar content exists at more than one URL, a canonical tag tells search engines which version is the "real" one to index and rank. Without it, search engines may split ranking signals across duplicate URLs, or pick the wrong version themselves. HTTPS and basic security Search engines treat HTTPS as a baseline expectation, not a bonus, at this point. If your site is still on HTTP, that's one of the first things to fix. Crawlability and site architecture Keep your site structure shallow enough that important pages are reachable within a few clicks from the homepage, and make sure every important page is linked from somewhere else on the site. Orphan pages, meaning pages with no internal links pointing to them, are much harder for search engines to find and trust. Duplicate content Duplicate or near-duplicate content, whether it's the same page accessible at multiple URLs, printer-friendly versions, or content copied across several pages of a site, can confuse search engines about which version to rank, and in the worst cases can dilute rankings across all versions instead of consolidating them behind one strong page. Canonical tags help here, but the more durable fix is simply avoiding creating duplicate content in the first place wherever you can. 301 redirects and site changes When a URL changes, whether from a redesign, a rebrand, or deleting an old page, a 301 redirect tells both search engines and visitors that the content has permanently moved to a new location, and passes most of the old page's ranking value along with it. Skipping this step during a site migration is one of the most common and most damaging mistakes I see, sometimes wiping out years of accumulated rankings overnight. If you're planning any kind of URL change at scale, map every old URL to its new destination before you make the change, not after. JavaScript SEO, briefly Modern websites often rely heavily on JavaScript to render content in the browser. Search engines can generally process JavaScript now, but it's slower and less reliable than working with content that's present in the initial HTML. As a beginner, you don't need to become a JavaScript expert, but if you're using a modern framework to build your site, it's worth checking, using Search Console's URL Inspection tool, that Google is actually seeing your full content and not a blank or partial page. Local and ecommerce SEO: do beginners need these? Most of what's above applies to any website. Two common business types need a bit more on top of it. Local SEO basics If you run a business that serves customers in a specific area, a dentist, a plumber, a local restaurant, local SEO deserves attention from day one, not as an afterthought. Claim and fully complete your Google Business Profile, keeping your business name, address and phone number, often shortened to NAP, exactly consistent everywhere it appears online, including on directory sites and your own website's footer. Inconsistent NAP information across the web is one of the more common, and more overlooked, reasons a local business struggles to appear in the local map pack results. Genuine customer reviews, and responding to them, also carry real weight in local rankings, more than most beginners expect. Ecommerce SEO basics If you're running a store, product and category pages need their own attention beyond generic on-page advice. Write unique product descriptions instead of using the manufacturer's stock copy, which is often duplicated across dozens of competing stores. Use product schema markup so prices, availability and reviews can appear directly in search results. Pay particular attention to faceted navigation, the filters for size, color and price that ecommerce platforms generate, since these can create thousands of near-duplicate, low-value URLs that waste crawl budget if left unmanaged. A beginner ecommerce site doesn't need to solve all of this on day one, but it's worth knowing these issues exist before a catalog grows to the point where fixing them becomes a much bigger project. Step 4: Content strategy for beginners Good on-page SEO on individual pages only goes so far without a broader content plan tying those pages together. Build topic clusters, not random posts A topic cluster is a group of related pages, usually a central "pillar" page like this one, supported by more specific posts that link back to it and to each other. This structure helps search engines understand the full depth of your expertise on a subject, and it helps readers move naturally from a broad overview into the specific answer they need. Match content type to search intent Go back to the intent categories from earlier. Informational searches usually want guides, explainers or how-tos. Commercial-investigation searches want comparisons and reviews. Transactional searches want product or service pages that make it easy to act. Publishing the wrong content type for the intent, even if it's well written, tends to underperform. Update content instead of only publishing new content Search engines reward pages that stay accurate and current. Revisiting and updating an existing page that's slipping in rankings is often faster and more effective than writing something brand new, especially once your site has been live for a year or more. Write a brief before you write the page A content brief is a short plan you write before drafting: the target keyword and its close variants, the intent you're writing for, the questions the page needs to answer, and a look at what's currently ranking so you know what bar you're trying to clear. Skipping this step and writing straight from a keyword alone is how beginners end up with content that's well written but misses what the searcher actually needed. Ten minutes of planning saves a rewrite later. E-E-A-T, and why it matters even for beginners E-E-A-T stands for Experience, Expertise, Authoritativeness and Trustworthiness, a framework Google's own quality rater guidelines use to describe what separates genuinely useful content from content that merely exists. For a beginner, the practical version is this: write from real, first-hand knowledge where you have it, cite sources when you don't, be transparent about who's writing and why they're qualified to, and don't publish confident-sounding content on topics, particularly health, finance or safety, where being wrong could genuinely hurt someone. Sites in those sensitive categories face extra scrutiny, and thin, unverified content struggles there more than almost anywhere else. Step 5: Off-page SEO and authority basics Off-page SEO covers signals from outside your own website that affect how much search engines trust it, primarily backlinks, meaning other sites linking to yours. Why backlinks still matter A link from another site acts as a kind of vote of confidence. Search engines weigh links from relevant, trustworthy sites more heavily than links from low-quality or unrelated ones. A single link from a respected publication in your industry can matter more than a hundred links from irrelevant directories. How beginners can earn links honestly Publish something genuinely useful enough that other people want to reference it: original data, a genuinely helpful guide, a tool. Reach out to sites that have linked to similar content before, and offer something specific and relevant, not a generic "check out my site" email. Guest posting on legitimate, relevant publications can work, but low-quality guest posting purely for links has become a liability rather than an asset over the past several years. What to avoid entirely Buying links in bulk, participating in link exchange schemes, or using automated link-building software all violate search engine guidelines and can get a site penalized. I don't recommend any of them to beginners, even the ones that promise fast results, because the sites I've seen recover from a manual link penalty spend far more time and money undoing the damage than they saved by cutting the corner in the first place. Digital PR, in beginner terms Digital PR is essentially traditional PR aimed partly at earning links: pitching journalists and publishers a genuinely newsworthy story, a piece of original data, a survey, an interesting angle tied to current events in your industry, in exchange for coverage that includes a link back to your site. It's a slower, more skill-intensive form of link building than most beginner content, but the links it earns tend to be from exactly the kind of authoritative, relevant sites that move the needle most. As a beginner, you don't need to run a full digital PR campaign, but keep it in mind as the direction to grow into once basic on-page and technical work is solid. Do social shares affect rankings? Not directly. There's no confirmed mechanism where a share on social media itself boosts rankings. Indirectly, content that gets shared widely is more likely to be seen by people who run websites, some of whom then link to it. Treat social distribution as a way to get content in front of more eyes, including people who might link to it, not as an SEO tactic in its own right. Measuring SEO results SEO takes time to show results, which makes measurement especially important for staying oriented while you wait. Google Search Console This free tool from Google shows you which queries your pages are actually appearing for, your average position, click-through rate, and any indexing or technical issues Google has flagged. If you set up nothing else as a beginner, set up Search Console first. It's the closest thing to a direct line into how Google sees your site. Google Analytics Analytics shows you what happens after someone lands on your site: which pages they visit, how long they stay, and whether they take the action you wanted. Rankings and traffic matter less than what that traffic actually does once it arrives. Rank tracking Tools like Ahrefs, Semrush or smaller rank trackers show you where specific keywords rank over time. Useful for spotting trends, but I'd caution beginners against checking daily. Rankings fluctuate constantly for reasons that have nothing to do with your work, and daily checking mostly just creates unnecessary anxiety. What to actually look at week to week Early on, watch impressions and average position in Search Console more than clicks or conversions. A page that's climbing from position 40 to position 15 is making real progress even though it may still be generating little to no traffic, because most click volume concentrates in the top few positions. Beginners who only watch traffic often conclude, wrongly, that nothing is working during this early climbing phase, and change course right before the page was about to start paying off. Give a genuinely well-built page at least a few months of stable data before deciding it isn't working and starting over. Setting realistic benchmarks Compare a page's performance against its own past data, not against a competitor's much older, more established page. A three-month-old page on a new site and a five-year-old page on an established competitor's site aren't playing on the same field yet, and measuring your early progress against theirs will make reasonable progress look like failure. What I've learned from real SEO projects that beginner guides rarely mention After thousands of projects, a few patterns show up again and again that most introductory SEO content skips. Technical audits rarely fail because of one catastrophic problem. They fail because of ten small ones stacking up: a slightly slow homepage, a handful of broken internal links, a sitemap that hasn't been updated in two years, a few pages accidentally set to noindex during a redesign. Beginners searching for "the one big fix" usually don't find it, because it's rarely there. When a client asks me to find "the thing that's wrong," I have to explain, more often than not, that the honest answer is a list of eight or nine small things, none of which would matter much on its own, but which add up to a site that's harder for both search engines and visitors to trust. Content volume is not a substitute for content quality, and this gets worse, not better, as more people use AI writing tools to publish faster. Publishing more thin pages just gives search engines more thin pages to ignore. I'd rather see a beginner publish five genuinely thorough pages in three months than fifty shallow ones. Most SEO "penalties" beginners panic about aren't manual penalties at all. They're algorithm updates affecting the whole site's visibility because of a broader quality issue, not a specific rule violation. Chasing a fix for a penalty that was never actually applied wastes time that should go toward the underlying quality problem. Common beginner SEO mistakes I still see in audits A few mistakes come up often enough, across completely unrelated industries, that they're worth calling out directly. Optimizing for a keyword nobody actually searches, because it sounds right internally, rather than checking real search demand first. Internal language and customer language often diverge more than business owners expect. Writing the title tag and meta description last, as an afterthought, instead of treating them as part of the page. They're often the first thing, sometimes the only thing, a searcher reads before deciding whether to click. Blocking staging or development versions of a site improperly, so that a test version ends up indexed alongside, or instead of, the real site. This happens more often during redesigns than most beginners expect. Treating SEO as a one-time setup instead of ongoing maintenance. A site optimized once and never revisited tends to slide backward as competitors keep publishing and updating while it stays static. Expecting a single blog post to rank for a highly competitive head term within weeks. Competitive terms are competitive because established sites with years of authority are already targeting them. Realistic expectations save a lot of beginner frustration. A realistic 90-day plan for a beginner If you want a rough order of operations instead of a list of topics to study, here's roughly how I'd sequence the first three months on a new site. Days 1 to 14: Set up Search Console and Analytics. Run a basic technical check: is the site crawlable, indexed, mobile-friendly and reasonably fast. Fix anything that blocks crawling or indexing before touching anything else, since nothing downstream matters until this is solid. Days 15 to 30: Do initial keyword research and build your topic map. Choose three to five topics to focus on first, based on relevance to your business and realistic competition for a new site, not on the highest search volume alone. Days 31 to 60: Build out on-page fundamentals across your most important existing pages, title tags, headings, internal links, and write your first few pieces of genuinely thorough content against the keyword map from the previous step. Days 61 to 90: Start basic off-page outreach for a small number of realistic, relevant link opportunities. Begin reviewing early Search Console data to see which pages are gaining impressions, and use that to decide what to double down on next. This timeline assumes steady, part-time effort, not a full-time team. Adjust the pace to your own resources, but keep the order roughly the same: technical foundation first, then research and structure, then content, then off-page work. Doing them out of order is one of the most common reasons beginner SEO efforts stall. One more thing about this timeline worth saying plainly: it will feel slow around week six or seven, after the initial setup energy wears off and before any of the content has had time to earn rankings. That flat stretch is normal, not a sign something's wrong. Every project I've worked on that eventually performed well went through some version of it. Why I don't recommend chasing every algorithm update Beginners often panic after reading news about a Google algorithm update, then scramble to reverse-engineer what changed and rewrite everything to match. I don't recommend this. Individual updates are usually refinements to how existing quality signals are weighted, not a new set of rules to memorize. Sites built on genuinely useful, well-structured content generally weather updates far better than sites built by chasing whatever the update before was rumored to reward. Build for the searcher, and most updates end up working in your favor rather than against you. How long does SEO take to show results? This is one of the most common questions I get from beginners, and the honest answer is that it depends heavily on your site's age, competition and starting point, but most sites see meaningful movement somewhere between three and six months, with more substantial results building over six to twelve months. A brand-new site in a competitive niche will generally take longer than an established site making overdue fixes. I won't give you a guaranteed timeline, because nobody legitimately can. Anyone promising a specific ranking by a specific date, without knowing your site and your competition in detail, is guessing. What SEO can't guarantee No SEO consultant, course or guide controls Google's algorithm, and none of us can guarantee a specific ranking position, a specific amount of traffic, or that any page will appear in Google's AI Overviews or in ChatGPT. What good SEO practice can do is put your site in a strong position to compete for visibility, based on the same fundamentals search engines have rewarded for years: crawlability, relevance, quality and trust. Be skeptical of anyone who promises more certainty than that. SEO and AI search: what beginners should know now Search itself is changing. Google's AI Overviews, along with tools like ChatGPT and Perplexity, are increasingly used for the kind of informational searches that used to go straight to a list of blue links. I don't treat this as a reason to abandon traditional SEO. The fundamentals, clear content, real expertise, technical accessibility, still determine whether AI systems can find and use your content in the first place. If anything, being genuinely clear, well-structured and specific matters more now, not less, because these systems are picking a smaller number of sources to summarize from. For a beginner, the practical takeaway is simple: write clear, direct answers to real questions, back them with evidence, and the same page tends to perform reasonably well in both traditional rankings and AI-generated answers. Two related terms come up often enough that beginners should at least recognize them. Answer Engine Optimization, or AEO, is about structuring content so answer-oriented systems, including Google's own featured snippets and AI Overviews, can easily extract a direct answer, clear definitions, question-based headings, concise opening answers followed by detail, which is part of why this guide is written the way it is. Generative Engine Optimization, or GEO, is the broader practice of building the kind of authority, citability and entity clarity that makes a brand more likely to be referenced by generative AI tools generally, not just Google's. Neither is a replacement for the fundamentals in this guide. Both are extensions of the same underlying idea: be genuinely clear about what you know, and make it easy for a system, human or machine, to find and trust that answer. I'd caution against one thing specifically: don't let anyone, including me, promise you guaranteed placement inside an AI-generated answer. Nobody controls those systems' selection process from the outside, and the honest goal is eligibility and clarity, not a guarantee. SEO myths beginners should stop believing A handful of ideas keep circulating in beginner SEO communities long after they've stopped being true, or were never entirely true to begin with. Worth clearing up directly. "Meta keywords help you rank." The meta keywords tag was deprecated by Google over a decade ago and has no effect on rankings. It's harmless to include, but it's also pointless. "More content always beats less content." Search engines don't reward length for its own sake. A page that thoroughly answers a query in 600 words will consistently outperform a page that pads the same answer to 2,000 words with repetition and filler. Length should be a byproduct of thoroughness, not a target. "Submitting your site to hundreds of directories builds authority." This was a legitimate tactic roughly two decades ago. Today, mass directory submissions mostly produce low-quality, irrelevant links that do little to help and can occasionally look manipulative if done at scale. "You need to publish constantly to rank." Publishing frequency matters far less than most beginners assume. A site publishing one genuinely excellent, well-researched page a month will often outperform one publishing five mediocre pages a week, especially once you account for the time cost of maintaining and updating all of them later. "SEO is a one-time project." I mentioned this earlier, but it's worth repeating on its own, because it's the myth that causes the most long-term damage. Search engines, competitors and user expectations all keep moving. A site treated as "done" after the initial setup tends to lose ground slowly, then all at once, as competitors keep iterating and it doesn't. "Negative SEO from competitors is why my rankings dropped." It happens, but it's much rarer than beginners assume, and it's usually the first explanation reached for instead of the more common and more fixable cause: an algorithm update, a technical issue introduced during a site change, or a genuine quality gap against competitors who've simply gotten better. Rule out your own site first before assuming sabotage. What "beginner" actually means in SEO, and when to move on I want to be specific about what this guide covers, because "beginner" gets used loosely. Everything above is enough to genuinely understand how SEO works, set up a new site correctly, and make consistent, informed improvements over your first several months. It is not the ceiling of the field. Advanced technical SEO on large sites, international SEO across multiple languages and regions, enterprise-scale content operations and sophisticated digital PR campaigns all sit well beyond what a beginner guide can responsibly cover in one page, and they're not necessary for the vast majority of small and mid-sized sites. A reasonable signal that you've outgrown "beginner" territory: you've worked through the checklist below, applied it consistently for a few months, and you're now running into questions this guide doesn't answer, like how to structure a site across multiple languages, or how to prioritize fixes across ten thousand product pages instead of ten. That's the point where a structured course or hands-on guidance starts paying for itself faster than continuing to piece things together from general guides, and it's roughly the line between what this pillar page covers and what the supporting posts and the Masterclass go on to build on. A beginner SEO checklist to start with this week Set up Google Search Console and Google Analytics if you haven't already. Check that your site is indexed by searching site:yourdomain.com in Google. Confirm your site is mobile-friendly and reasonably fast using PageSpeed Insights. Pick one topic cluster and write down five to ten real questions your customers ask about it. Choose one page to fully optimize first: clear title tag, one H1, logical headings, content that actually answers the query completely. Check your robots.txt file to make sure nothing important is accidentally blocked. Find three pages on your site with no internal links pointing to them and fix that. Write down, in one sentence, the primary keyword and intent for your five most important pages, and check whether the current content actually matches that intent. Look at what's currently ranking for your top target keyword and note honestly whether your planned page can genuinely match or beat it. How SEO fits alongside other marketing channels SEO rarely works best in isolation, and it's worth understanding roughly where it sits relative to other channels before you commit significant time to it. Compared to paid search, SEO is slower to show results but doesn't stop producing traffic the moment you stop spending, the way ads do. A reasonable approach for many beginners is running paid ads for immediate visibility while SEO builds underneath it over the following months, then gradually shifting budget as organic traffic starts covering more of the load. Compared to social media, SEO traffic tends to have higher intent, since the person is actively searching for something rather than passively scrolling, which generally translates into better conversion rates. Social media is often stronger for brand awareness and reaching people who don't yet know they have the problem your business solves. The two work well together: social content that earns links and mentions can indirectly support SEO, while SEO content gives you something substantial to share on social in the first place. Compared to email marketing, SEO's role is mostly at the top of the funnel, bringing new people in, while email nurtures people who are already on your list. Building an email capture into your best-performing SEO content is one of the more underused tactics I see beginners skip. None of this means SEO deserves 100% of a marketing budget or 0% of it. It means treating SEO as one channel among several, with its own particular strengths, mainly compounding value over time and high buyer intent, and its own particular weakness, being slow to start. Frequently asked questions Is SEO still worth learning with AI search growing? Yes. AI-powered search tools still rely on crawling and understanding real web content to generate their answers, so the underlying skills, technical accessibility, clear writing, genuine expertise, remain directly relevant. The channels are diversifying. The fundamentals aren't disappearing. How much does it cost to learn SEO? You can learn the fundamentals for free through official documentation from Google, Search Console's own help resources, and reputable free content. Paid courses, mine included, add structure, practice and feedback that speed up the process, but they're not the only path to competence. Do I need to know how to code to do SEO? No. Basic familiarity with HTML helps, particularly for understanding headings, title tags and meta descriptions, but most on-page and content SEO work doesn't require writing code. Technical SEO work at a deeper level benefits from some technical comfort, though not necessarily coding ability. What's the difference between SEO and SEM? SEO is organic, unpaid visibility in search results. SEM, search engine marketing, usually refers to paid search advertising, like Google Ads. Some people use SEM as an umbrella term covering both. In practice, most people mean paid ads specifically. Can I do SEO myself, or do I need to hire someone? Plenty of small business owners and beginners successfully do their own SEO, especially early on. The case for hiring or training up shifts once the site is larger, the competition is more sophisticated, or the time cost of doing it yourself outweighs the cost of getting help. There's no universal answer, it depends on your time, your site's stage, and how competitive your market is. What's the single most common reason beginner SEO fails? In my experience, it's inconsistency, not lack of knowledge. Beginners often learn the fundamentals correctly, apply them for a few weeks, don't see immediate results, and stop before the work has had time to compound. SEO is closer to compounding interest than a light switch. The sites that struggle most usually aren't the ones that got a tactic wrong; they're the ones that gave up during the normal, expected lag between doing the work and seeing it reflected in rankings. Should I focus on Google specifically, or other search engines too? For most businesses, Google is worth the overwhelming majority of your attention, given its share of search traffic in most markets. Bing is a reasonable secondary consideration, particularly since it powers some AI search experiences behind the scenes. I wouldn't recommend a beginner split meaningful effort across multiple traditional search engines early on. The fundamentals covered in this guide transfer reasonably well between them regardless. How do I know if my SEO is actually working? Look at Search Console impressions and average position for your target keywords over a period of months, not days, alongside actual traffic and conversions in Analytics. Early progress often shows up first as impressions and position improving before clicks and conversions catch up, so if you're only watching your final conversion numbers, you may miss the earlier signal that things are moving in the right direction. What should a complete beginner learn first if they only have a few hours a week? Start with search intent and how search engines crawl and index a page. Those two ideas reframe almost everything else in this guide, and they're the two most beginners skip past to get to "actionable tips" faster. Once those are genuinely clear, the rest of the fundamentals, keyword research, on-page structure, basic technical checks, click into place faster than tackling them in isolation first.

Mukta Akter

Biography